Help Page


Genome-Wide Assosiation Study (GWAS)

GWAS is a widely used case-control approach to study genetic associations with different traits ranging from eye color to complex diseases. It has been used to discover genetic markers resulting in various genetic diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and many other traits (BertramandTanzi2009),it has become a standard statistical approach to investigate genotype-phenotype relations.

Ontology-Wide Assosiation Study (OWAS)

Using ontologies, we can aggregate patient information over the structure of the ontology and thereby increase statistical power of the GWAS. We are able to test associations with classes in the ontology that have never been directly observed but which only arise through the ontology structure and hierarchy. We can also use the ontology to discriminate associations between sibling classes, thereby leading to more specific associations.

UKBiobank: A British biobank with vast amount of subjects and data on each subject

Sibling Case/Control

This method is used to find what makes one disease stand out from other similar diseases in an ontology. As normal the cases are the same as normal study, but the controls subset contains individuals that is a part of at least one of the super classes of the studied disease and does not have the disease itself. This result in the output will be more specified finding variants that is more prevalent in this disease than similar ones.

Normal Illustration

Here our studied class and all subclasses are in the case subset, while everyone else is part of the control subset

Sibling Illustration

Here our studied class and all subclasses are in the case subset, while all subjects that is in the our class superclass and its sublclasses (except case subjects) is in the control subset. All other subjects not in these two subsets will be ignored.


FAQ

Why can I not find a specific disease or phenotype?

Each study have a requirement of containing at least 100 cases. This is because the the fewer cases a study have the worse the quality is for that study.

Why is there studies with less than 100 cases?

Sometimes our settings for our GWAS will remove unfit cases to under our at least 100 cases rule. For gender filtering we do not apply this rule, as long as the total sum of cases is at least 100.

There seems to be missing links between HPO and ICD

Yes, our links have been generated with text mining in litratre and have not been able to find all links with high enough confidence.

Link in "Compare GWAS" do not work

"Compare GWAS" does not make sure the plots exists, it only generates the right link. Please be sure that inputted code exists in our database.

What software do you use?

For our GWAS we use Plink Version 1 , with the settings MAF: 0.01 and GENO: 0.1

Can I download your data?

As of now you can not, but we are working to implement this in the future


If you have further questions, please feel free to send me an email on: runar.reve@kaust.edu.sa